<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Possible Locations and Postions of Lenchwick Windfarm Turbines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoplenchwickwindfarm.org.uk/main-content/possible-locations-and-postions-of-lenchwick-windfarm-turbines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoplenchwickwindfarm.org.uk/main-content/possible-locations-and-postions-of-lenchwick-windfarm-turbines/</link>
	<description>Providing Information to The Wychavon Community to make an Informed Decision</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stoplenchwickwindfarm</title>
		<link>http://www.stoplenchwickwindfarm.org.uk/main-content/possible-locations-and-postions-of-lenchwick-windfarm-turbines/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>stoplenchwickwindfarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoplenchwickwindfarm.org.uk/?p=41#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Chris, thanks for comments. 

This map is very preliminary and as soon as we have full facts we will update it. Thank you for the details about the mobile home.

The instersection, and overlap is deliberate, the edge of the circle represents where the next turbine could be, the dot the pylon that supports it.

Scottish Power Renewables stated that they could be spaced a minimum of 250-300m apart laterally and 500m downwind, and that the predominant wind was South Westerly the footprints are shown as 250m RADIUS. 

Allowing for that intersection it is possible that all 10 turbines could be placed in either of the two blue areas. See new entry (It still doesn&#039;t take account of the mobile home that you mention)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, thanks for comments. </p>
<p>This map is very preliminary and as soon as we have full facts we will update it. Thank you for the details about the mobile home.</p>
<p>The instersection, and overlap is deliberate, the edge of the circle represents where the next turbine could be, the dot the pylon that supports it.</p>
<p>Scottish Power Renewables stated that they could be spaced a minimum of 250-300m apart laterally and 500m downwind, and that the predominant wind was South Westerly the footprints are shown as 250m RADIUS. </p>
<p>Allowing for that intersection it is possible that all 10 turbines could be placed in either of the two blue areas. See new entry (It still doesn&#8217;t take account of the mobile home that you mention)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.stoplenchwickwindfarm.org.uk/main-content/possible-locations-and-postions-of-lenchwick-windfarm-turbines/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoplenchwickwindfarm.org.uk/?p=41#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I think you have failed to account for the mobile home at the end of the track leading due south from Rookery Farm Ab lench, which reduces the eligible area for turbines on the western site
Second parts of your turbine footprints in some cases fall outside the shaded areas and some intersect.
I understood that the proximity measurements were not flexible. This would mean fewer machines.
I&#039;d be interested to know the comments from the company on the map</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have failed to account for the mobile home at the end of the track leading due south from Rookery Farm Ab lench, which reduces the eligible area for turbines on the western site<br />
Second parts of your turbine footprints in some cases fall outside the shaded areas and some intersect.<br />
I understood that the proximity measurements were not flexible. This would mean fewer machines.<br />
I&#8217;d be interested to know the comments from the company on the map</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.885 seconds -->
